<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SimpliFlying &#187; EasyJet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simpliflying.com/tag/easyjet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simpliflying.com</link>
	<description>Helping airlines &#38; airports engage travelers, profitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ancillary revenue: A boon or a bane for the airline brand?</title>
		<link>http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenue-a-boon-or-a-bane-for-the-airline-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenue-a-boon-or-a-bane-for-the-airline-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shashank Nigam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancillary Revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancillary revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EasyJet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low-cost carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryanair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Airways]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpliflying.com/?p=1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing with the ancillary revenues special this March, I&#8217;d like to explore the issue whether ancillary revenues are good for the airline brand, or detrimental. We all know they&#8217;re good for the balance sheet, but what about the brand? To answer this question, let me segment ancillary revenues in two bands &#8211; charging for value [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the <a href="http://simpliflying.com/category/ancillary-revenues/">ancillary revenues special</a> this March, I&#8217;d like to explore the issue whether ancillary revenues are good for the airline brand, or detrimental. We all know they&#8217;re good for the balance sheet, but what about the brand? To answer this question, let me segment ancillary revenues in two bands &#8211; charging for value addition, and un-bundling current product and services.</p>
<h2>Charging the passenger for value-addition</h2>
<p>A comment on the <a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/king-of-ancillary-revenues-ryanair-offers-e1000-for-best-idea-on-making-money/#comments">hotly debated article</a> I wrote on RyanAir&#8217;s competition for charging passengers got me thinking. Here&#8217;s what Shyrose had to say:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="color: #008000;"><span class="il">&#8220;RyanAir</span> should link up with the local <span class="il">taxi</span> companies of the detination airports and agree a deal with them, whereby flyers can book their <span class="il">taxi</span> on the plane so it&#8217;s ready and waiting for them the other side. <span class="il">Taxi</span> companies give Ryannair a referral fee, and <span class="il">Ryanair</span> will be positioned as offering greater value service for customers.&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p>And I think Shyrose is bang-on-target. <strong>Customers don&#8217;t mind paying for additional services they value.</strong> And this is especially true when the offer is in-sync with the brand expectation. There are ample examples of such value addition. Travel insurance and car rental are popular ones. The intelligent seating system I talked about in an earlier article is another. Singapore Airlines has &#8220;boarding pass privelages&#8221; for its flyers, where they get discounts at restaurants in major cities by presenting their boarding pass. And the airline probably gets a commission from the restaurant for this.</p>
<p>Such tactics are great for the legacy airline, since they&#8217;re anyway charging a higher fare for value-added service on-board, and the target customer would be the right one for such an offering.</p>
<h2>Un-bundling the product and service</h2>
<p>People mention RyanAir and easyJet as champions when it comes to earning ancillary revenues by charging the customer for everything other than the seat &#8211; 16% of easyJet&#8217;s revenues are from ancillary sources. But another airline that has done a good job with un-bundling the product is Air Canada. <strong>You can choose the fare based on your preference of the level of in-flight amenities.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Air Canada booking" src="http://simpliflying.com/wp-content/uploads/canada.jpg" alt="" width="592" height="296" /></p>
<p>Where this approach gets ugly is when airlines start charging for everything from a cup of water (US Airways) to even the loo (RyanAir?)! And this is where the whole resonance with the brand becomes important.</p>
<h2>How far can the brand be stretched?</h2>
<p>Everyone knows that RyanAir is a low-cost airline and you&#8217;re only paying for the seat. You can look at a simple chart of all additional fees on their website. <strong>RyanAir is very, very transparent about what you have to pay for, and what&#8217;s included in the fare. </strong>And this transparency only strenghtens the brand promise further &#8211; that of the cheapest seat.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this is a something even legacy airlines are doing, but without the transparency. For example, information on additional charges is spread all over the American Airlines website, and you&#8217;re bound to learn of an additional charge at the counter. This creates a lot of confusion in the travelers mind and erodes brand loyalty.</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s a simple model I feel airlines should follow</strong>: legacy carriers should largely go for providing value-added services and then charging for them, and budget carriers should mostly un-bundle their offerings so that passengers can get some additional comforts, other than the seat. Of course, they should learn from each other. But at the same time, should avoid doing something absolutely detrimental to the brand. Need an example? Singapore Airlines charging $100 for a round-trip flight for choosing an emergency-exit row seat! I know for a fact that this move has annoyed even the most loyal customers!</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>What do you think? How can airlines earn ancillary revenues without resulting in a conflict with the brand? Does the solution I proposed make sense? Any examples of airlines doing this well?</strong></span></em></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/king-of-ancillary-revenues-ryanair-offers-e1000-for-best-idea-on-making-money/">King of ancillary revenues, RyanAir offers €1,000 for best idea on making money!</a> (simpliflying.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/77496b4f-cfc0-41a6-afb7-32eb950a3ea6/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=77496b4f-cfc0-41a6-afb7-32eb950a3ea6" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/king-of-ancillary-revenues-ryanair-offers-e1000-for-best-idea-on-making-money/" rel="bookmark" title="March 13, 2009">King of ancillary revenues, RyanAir offers €1,000 for best idea on making money!</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenues-and-airline-branding-webinar-slides-with-video/" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Ancillary revenues and airline branding webinar slides (with video!)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2010/low-cost-airline-brands-get-creative-with-ancillary-revenues-lounges-shops-and-cargo/" rel="bookmark" title="February 11, 2010">Low cost airline brands get creative with ancillary revenues &#8211; lounges, shops and cargo!</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/hot-topic-will-ryanair-charging-for-toilets-work-for-its-brand/" rel="bookmark" title="March 4, 2009">Hot topic: Will Ryanair charging for toilets work for its brand?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenues-and-airline-branding-special-in-march-at-simpliflying/" rel="bookmark" title="March 2, 2009">Ancillary revenues and airline branding Special in March at SimpliFlying</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.361 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenue-a-boon-or-a-bane-for-the-airline-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ancillary revenues and airline branding Special in March at SimpliFlying</title>
		<link>http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenues-and-airline-branding-special-in-march-at-simpliflying/</link>
		<comments>http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenues-and-airline-branding-special-in-march-at-simpliflying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shashank Nigam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancillary Revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EasyJet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryanair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SkyEurope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Blue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simpliflying.com/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia Dear Readers, I hope you enjoyed the India Special in February on SimpliFlying, where I featured case-studies and interviews on airline branding in India, including that of the COO of SpiceJet and COO of Indigo Airlines. I received an overwhelming response to these articles too. Hence, I&#8217;ve decided to make the first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 212px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Low.cost.carrier.easyjet.arp.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g984]"><img title="EasyJet Boeing 737-700 waiting for take off at..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/26/Low.cost.carrier.easyjet.arp.jpg/202px-Low.cost.carrier.easyjet.arp.jpg" alt="EasyJet Boeing 737-700 waiting for take off at..." width="202" height="138" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Low.cost.carrier.easyjet.arp.jpg" rel="wp-prettyPhoto[g984]">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>Dear Readers,</p>
<p>I hope you enjoyed the <a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/02/">India Special in February</a> on SimpliFlying, where I featured case-studies and interviews on airline branding in India, including that of the COO of SpiceJet and COO of Indigo Airlines. I received an overwhelming response to these articles too. Hence, I&#8217;ve decided to make the first fortnight in March, the Ancillary Revenues Special.</p>
<h2>Ancillary revenues + airline branding = Even greater profits!</h2>
<p>Why, ancillary revenues, you may think. <strong>That&#8217;s because it becomes an extremely powerful concept when in sync with the brand strategy.</strong> For example, when you fly Singapore Airlines, you don&#8217;t imagine paying for food on-board, due to their brand positioning as a premium airline. And that&#8217;s why their decision to charge for emergency row seats came as a shock to many. This is because the <a class="zem_slink" title="Ancillary revenue" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancillary_revenue">ancillary revenue</a> strategy did not resonate with the brand strategy. Hence, the aim of this special feature will be to feature case studies, interviews and analysis on how airlines can leverage their brand while building multiple sources of income.</p>
<p>Still not convinced, here&#8217;re some ancillary revenue statistics to whet your appetite:</p>
<ul>
<li> EasyJet earning <strong>£77m</strong> or an extra £3.81 per seat</li>
<li> Ryanair generating <strong>£221m</strong> in ancillary revenue</li>
<li> LCCs at the World Low Cost Airline Congress aiming for ancillary revenues of <strong>10-20%</strong></li>
<li> <strong>63%</strong> of airline managers believe unbundling is the future</li>
<li> Major airline brands becoming one stop shops that offer all travel products</li>
<li> Increase brand reputation and loyalty by offering products that enhance the travel experience</li>
<li> AirAsia&#8217;s ancillary revenue <strong>grew by 77%</strong> allowing fares to go down 2%</li>
<li> SkyEurope generating <strong>18% of revenue</strong> from ancillary products and services</li>
<li> Virgin Blue&#8217;s ancillary revenue equivilant to the yearly <strong>operating costs of 4 planes</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t already done so, I’d like to invite you to subscribe SimpliFlying by <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=1935516&amp;loc=en_US" target="_blank">email</a> or <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/simpliflying/feed" target="_blank"><span class="nfakPe">RSS</span></a> so that you can get the updates from the convenience of your inbox.</p>
<p>Keep soaring,<br />
Shashank</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/13f12abc-fbd6-4885-bc1c-1b4e3ee37e34/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=13f12abc-fbd6-4885-bc1c-1b4e3ee37e34" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2010/low-cost-airline-brands-get-creative-with-ancillary-revenues-lounges-shops-and-cargo/" rel="bookmark" title="February 11, 2010">Low cost airline brands get creative with ancillary revenues &#8211; lounges, shops and cargo!</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenues-and-airline-branding-webinar-slides-with-video/" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Ancillary revenues and airline branding webinar slides (with video!)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2011/what-do-travelers-buy-most-at-airports-chocolate-infographic-reveals-top-purchases-at-changi-airport/" rel="bookmark" title="August 10, 2011">What do travelers buy most at airports? Chocolate! Infographic reveals top purchases at Changi Airport</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenue-a-boon-or-a-bane-for-the-airline-brand/" rel="bookmark" title="March 16, 2009">Ancillary revenue: A boon or a bane for the airline brand?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://simpliflying.com/2009/how-an-intelligent-seating-system-can-bring-ancillary-revenues-and-is-great-for-the-airline-brand/" rel="bookmark" title="March 11, 2009">How an intelligent seating system can bring ancillary revenues, and is great for the airline brand</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.692 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://simpliflying.com/2009/ancillary-revenues-and-airline-branding-special-in-march-at-simpliflying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

